Monument or shammal? Weinheimer argue for Nazi monument!

Monument or shammal? Weinheimer argue for Nazi monument!

In Weinheim, a new monument causes heated discussions. The monument that is reminiscent of the time of National Socialism is viewed by many citizens: on the inside as a memorial, while others judge it as a shame. This can be seen in a recent report by Wnoz . Opinions about the review of the past are divided. Hans Müller, a long -time Weinheimer, explains: "A monument is important so as not to forget the victims." In contrast, Petra Schneider, who emphasizes: "We shouldn't glorify such memorabilia."

The debate about the monument raises questions that not only affect Weinheim. How do we deal with the dark story that is deeply rooted in many German cities? The historian Dr. Klaus Becker demands more information and discussion on site to integrate the different perspectives of the citizens: inside. "This is the only way to develop a common culture of remembrance in society," he says. The city's Council of Elders has already indicated that additional events are planned to further discuss these questions.

a sign of memory

The initiative for the monument was launched by a group of citizens: inside that decided to set a sign against forgetting. Many see it as a necessary step to keep the memory of the victims of the Nazi regime alive. The city administration also emphasizes that the monument should act as an educational instrument.

While some welcome the monument, other concerns about the design and the placement say. "It could lead to a recovery through right -wing extremists," warns social scientist Prof. Thomas Reinhardt. These fears are not unfounded, as the recent incidents in other cities show where there were controversy about similar monuments.

beyond: the digital world and data protection