Exposed and drunk: 26-year-old causes excitement in the city park!
Exposed and drunk: 26-year-old causes excitement in the city park!
Mosbach, Deutschland - An unusual incident shook the otherwise so tranquil atmosphere of the city park in Mosbach on Friday evening. At around 5:45 p.m., a 26-year-old man exposed himself in front of a group of eight people, including both adults and children. According to reports of the RNZ, the man, who was obviously draminized, approached the group with down pants, stretched its genital part in its direction and began to urinate. Those present who pursued the incident with horror asked him to turn around and refrain from the inappropriate action.
In the city park, the group finally alerted the police, who could find the man on site. A breath alcohol test carried out resulted in a value of over 2.8 per thousand, which led to a dismissal for the site of the former state garden show. It is expected that an advertisement against the man will be filed for exhibitionist action.
What is exhibitionism?
But what exactly does that mean if someone exposes themselves in public? In Germany, a distinction is made between two relevant facts. Section 183 of the Criminal Code punishes exhibitionist acts that are available when a perpetrator shows his genitals without the consent of another person. Here those affected have to feel uncomfortable - for example through disgust or shame. This paragraph protects the individual sexual self -determination right of a person.
In contrast, Section 183a of the Criminal Code, which deals with the excitement of public annoyance. It is irrelevant whether the perpetrator is a man or a woman. Rather, it is crucial that the plot is perceptible from an indefinite number of passers -by and causes reluctance or annoyances. For many who are affected, it is crucial to know these legal differences and to obtain legal advice in good time to develop the best defense strategies.
legal consequences
The police often rigorously proceeds in such cases, which means that the incidents brought to notify can have serious consequences for the accused. Even unintentional naked, as it could occur in wild urine, does not count as exhibitionism in the legal sense. It remains to be seen how the public prosecutor will decide in this special case. According to experts, the intention of exciting a annoyance is hardly proven in many procedures, which further increases the legal complexity of such acts.
In summary, it remains to be said that both the victims and the perpetrators urgently need competent legal advice in such cases. A sensible defense can often help with clearly punishable behavior. And as the example of the Mosbach man shows, it is important to be aware of the consequences and legal framework conditions of such actions.| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Mosbach, Deutschland |
| Quellen | |